![]() |
| Lukas Brezek |
Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Monkey Trap Nation
Tuesday, February 19, 2013
Pray for an Asteroid
On the morning of February 15, 2013, a 500-ton meteor entered the atmosphere somewhere near the Ural mountains, in the vicinity of Chelyabinsk, Russia, an industrial city of over a million. The intensity of the blast was estimated at around 500 kilotons of TNT equivalent, or 30 nuclear bombs of the type the Americans dropped on Nagasaki, Japan. The shock waves from the sonic boom it created blew out numerous windows. Around a thousand people were wounded, mostly with lacerations from flying glass; 40 of them remain hospitalized. The damage is being estimated at over one billion rubles ($33 million USD). Over 24,000 workers and volunteers, coordinated by Russia's Emergency Ministry, went to work on the clean-up. Their specific emphasis was on keeping buildings from freezing (the temperature in Chelyabinsk is around -20ºC). By February 17 much of the damage had been repaired. Schools, hospitals and other pubic buildings had their windows replaced and were reopened. The government is supplying replacement windows to residential buildings.
Tuesday, February 12, 2013
Book Excerpt: The wrong math
This is an excerpt from The Five Stages of Collapse: Survivors' Toolkit. Please order your copy for shipment in May.
An argument can be
made that lending at any rate of interest above 0 percent eventually
leads to a deflationary collapse followed by a quick but painful bout
of hyperinflation thrown in at the very end. A positive interest rate
requires exponential growth, and exponential growth, of anything,
anywhere, can only produce one outcome: collapse. This is because it
quickly outpaces any sustainable physical process in the universe,
outside of a few freak cases such as a sustained nuclear explosion,
where the entire universe blows up, taking all of us with it, along
with all of our debts.
![]() |
| NOT THE COVER! |
Tuesday, February 05, 2013
Book Excerpt: The Problem of Excessive Scale
This is an excerpt from The Five Stages of Collapse: Survivors' Toolkit. Please order your copy for shipment in May.
(Although the order is placed through PayPal, you don't need to have a PayPal account; just click "Don't have a PayPal Account?" during check-out and enter a credit or debit card number. If you do have a PayPal account, please make extra-double-sure that the shipping address associated with it is up-to-date and correct, and will remain that way through May.)
In his excellent book The Breakdown of Nations the maverick economist Leopold Kohr makes several stunning yet, upon reflection, commonsense observations. He points out that small states have tended to be far more culturally productive than large states, that all states go to war but that big states have disproportionately bigger wars that kill many times more people, and that by far the most stable and advantageous form of political organization is a loose confederation of states, each so small that none can dominate the rest. Kohr arrives at his conclusions by a process of reasoning by homology (viz. analogy) by analyzing many of the problems of modernity as different manifestations of the same underlying problem: the problem of excessive scale.
(Although the order is placed through PayPal, you don't need to have a PayPal account; just click "Don't have a PayPal Account?" during check-out and enter a credit or debit card number. If you do have a PayPal account, please make extra-double-sure that the shipping address associated with it is up-to-date and correct, and will remain that way through May.)
In his excellent book The Breakdown of Nations the maverick economist Leopold Kohr makes several stunning yet, upon reflection, commonsense observations. He points out that small states have tended to be far more culturally productive than large states, that all states go to war but that big states have disproportionately bigger wars that kill many times more people, and that by far the most stable and advantageous form of political organization is a loose confederation of states, each so small that none can dominate the rest. Kohr arrives at his conclusions by a process of reasoning by homology (viz. analogy) by analyzing many of the problems of modernity as different manifestations of the same underlying problem: the problem of excessive scale.
Tuesday, January 29, 2013
Tuesday, January 22, 2013
Book Announcement: The Five Stages of Collapse
Starting next Tuesday and for the next
three months this book will be available for pre-order right on this blog. (It will also be available elsewhere,
but on terms that don't come close to making book-writing a
sustainable proposition, so if you want me to keep writing you should
get the book directly from me.) As the publication date nears, I will
also be publishing some excerpts. [Minor note: there has been some
confusion regarding the book's subtitle; please ignore it.]
This book is based on the identically titled article I published on this blog in February
of 2008, just as financial collapse was starting to gather steam.
Since then, this article has been read nearly 100,000 times on this
blog alone (it has been reposted on many other web sites) and it is
its enduring popularity that has convinced me to write a book-length
treatment.
Tuesday, January 15, 2013
The Ecology of Hell
![]() |
| The End of Fun |
Friday, January 11, 2013
Interview on Business Matters
In this interview, recorded late last year, I discuss the differences in orientation between Russia, which is changing perhaps too swiftly, and the US, which remains stuck in the past. I also talk about community, and about lack of it, and what it means to live among people who insist on their right to remain strangers and who expect nothing from each other or their public officials. I also mention the force behind American political and social stasis: the desperate wish for a future that resembles the past—the American equivalent of Soviet nostalgia.
Tuesday, January 08, 2013
The Image of the Enemy
During my brief winter sojourn in
Russia a tiny cold war has erupted between Russia and the USA. First,
Mitt Romney calls Russia “our number one enemy” during the
presidential election campaign. Then, after the election, the US
passes the “Magnitsky Act” which promises to arrest funds and
deny visas to certain Russian officials based on a secret list. The
Russian legislature then responds with the “Dima Yakovlev Bill,”
named after a Russian boy who died of heat stroke after his American
adoptive parents left him locked in a car for nine hours. In addition
to vaguely symmetric retaliatory measures, this bill bans Americans
from adopting Russian orphans. This last little add-on may initially
seem rather daft as state policy, but it has some interesting
properties as Russian propaganda, of which you may not be aware.
Although from the US perspective this move has an inane “...or I
will shoot my dog” element to it, spun around the other way it
makes it look as if valiant Russian politicians are trying to stop
American fiends from torturing and killing innocent Russian orphans.
Tuesday, January 01, 2013
Out of Ideas
It's the first of the year, which is a
traditional time for prognosticators to do some prognosticating.
Since I have already explained
at length why it is quite possible to accurately predict that something will
eventually happen, but near-impossible to predict when it will happen (due
to total lack of relevant data on which to base such predictions) I
won't repeat myself here. Nor will I offer any predictions as to the
timing of various stages of collapse. (I know that the USA will
collapse politically, financially and commercially, but I don't know
when; nor does anyone else.) Instead, I would like to point out what I think is unlikely to
happen in 2013: I find it unlikely that this will be the year when
the various elites running the show here (elected and unelected
officials, academic authorities, corporations, think-tanks, mass media, etc.) will admit defeat: “The financial collapse of
2008 was the end of an era. What came before cannot be brought back.
We have been pretending that it can be brought back for half a decade, but now we
give up. Let's let the whole house of cards fall down, so that we can
start over.” Do you see any of them rising up and saying something
like that? I don't.











